# CONS Diagram
The CONS framework helps analyze how operations create value by connecting capabilities to customer needs through deliverable solutions and sellable offerings.
## CONS Syntax
```
Capability? Needs?
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
```
### Key Questions:
- **Capability?** What can we do? (Resources, skills, assets)
- **Needs?** What do customers want? (Problems, desires)
- **Deliverable?** Can we execute it? (Operational feasibility)
- **Sellable?** Will they buy it? (Market validation)
- **Solutions?** How do we do it? (Operational design)
- **Offering?** What do we promise? (Value proposition)
---
## π McDonald's
```
Capability? Needs?
Assembly line Quick meals
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
15-sec burgers Fast food
```
## βοΈ JetBlue
```
Capability? Needs?
Point-to-point Budget travel
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
High utilization Low fares
```
## π Uber
```
Capability? Needs?
Platform tech Riders & drivers
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Network density Instant rides
```
## π₯ MinuteClinic
```
Capability? Needs?
CVS locations Minor ailments
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Nurse protocols Walk-in care
```
## π¦ EOQ Model
```
Capability? Needs?
Storage space Stock levels
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Optimal orders Zero stockouts
```
## π Zara
```
Capability? Needs?
Vertical mfg Fresh fashion
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
2-week cycles Weekly drops
```
### Zara's Virtuous Cycle
```
Capability? Needs?
Fast design Trend seekers
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Small batches Buy-it-now
```
## π° Yedioth
```
Capability? Needs?
Weekly routes 14,000 SKUs
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Data analytics 95% fill rate
```
## π Amazon
```
Capability? Needs?
AI algorithms Everything
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Predictive ship 1-day Prime
```
### Walmart's Response
```
Capability? Needs?
4,700 stores Value + speed
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Store-as-DC 2-hr pickup
```
## π Nokia's Resilience
```
Capability? Needs?
Multi-source Zero downtime
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Quick recovery Stable supply
```
## π Traditional Distribution
```
Capability? Needs?
Van delivery Small stores
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Weekly routes One-stop shop
```
## π Pooled Strategy
```
Capability? Needs?
Central data Network risk
β² β±
Deliverable? β Sellable?
β± β²
Solutions? Offering?
Pool inventory Better fills
```
---
## Using CONS for Venture Evaluation
When evaluating ventures, look for evidence in each quadrant:
### Strong Ventures Show:
- **Clear Capability β Solution** link (Can they actually do it?)
- **Validated Needs β Offering** match (Do customers want it?)
- **Proven Deliverability** (Working prototype/pilot)
- **Demonstrated Sellability** (Customer commitments)
### Weak Ventures Have:
- Vague capabilities ("We're smart")
- Assumed needs ("Everyone wants this")
- No delivery proof ("Trust us")
- No sales evidence ("Build it and they will come")