cohesive column-wise structure and row-wise structure. what i mean by that is, if you choose any two rows and two columns and call the four cells A (row1, col1), B (row1, col2), C (row2, col1), D (row2, col2), then A:B = C:D (row wise cohesiveness) and A:C = B:D (column wise cohesiveness) should hold. ## eg(table) Column-wise: Each strategy type (e.g., IP vs Value Chain) maintains consistent relationships across all rows. For example, IP:Value Chain always represents a CONTROL:EXECUTION relationship Row-wise: Each pair of attributes (e.g., Customer Focus and Innovation Type) maintains consistent relationships across strategies. EXISTING:NEW users maps consistently to COMPONENT:SYSTEM innovations Summary of MIT Table: This framework presents a cohesive typology of entrepreneurial strategies that bridges resource allocation and market positioning. Each column represents a distinct strategic archetype characterized by its approach to value creation and capture, while rows systematically decompose these strategies along key dimensions that maintain logical consistency both horizontally and vertically. The framework's power lies in its ability to connect seemingly disparate concepts like customer focus and innovation type through consistent relationships - but how might we apply similar rigor to understanding learning strategies in entrepreneurship?