# 📜Academic Paper with five tables Analysis System (QA🗄️5) - LLM Instructions When user provides an academic paper and requests analysis using this system: 1. **Parse the paper** into logical sections (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, etc.) 2. **Extract core components** from each section using the QA framework (💭COMPONENT 1) 3. **Generate exactly 5 table outputs** in the specified order and format 4. **Apply color classification** to identify paper's primary contribution type ## COLOR CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Papers must be classified by their primary contribution: - 🟪 = Problem/Phenomena (validates that problems exist) - 🟩 = Need/Setup/Framed Phenomena (establishes how to think about needs) - 🟧 = Solution/Model (proposes specific solutions or frameworks) - 🟦 = Integrating Need-Solution (bridges understanding and implementation) ## MANDATORY OUTPUT STRUCTURE You MUST produce exactly these 5 components in this order: ### 💭COMPONENT 1: Section-by-Section Q&A Table ```markdown | Section/Subsection | 🔐Question | 🔑Answer | 🧱Literature Brick | |-------------------|------------|----------|-------------------| | [Section Name] | What specific problem/question does this section address? | [Use emoji symbols 🧍‍♀️🌏🧭🗺️💭📐💸 to highlight key concepts] | • Key citations<br>• Theoretical foundations | ``` **Instructions:** - One row per major section of the paper - Questions must be specific to that section's focus - Answers must include relevant emoji symbols from the system - Literature bricks list 2-3 key citations or theories mentioned ### 💭COMPONENT 2: Comparison with Existing Theories Table ```markdown | Aspect | [Theory/Approach 1] | [Theory/Approach 2] | [This Paper's Approach] | |--------|-------------------|-------------------|----------------------| | Core Assumption | [Description] | [Description] | [Paper's contribution - mark with 📐] | | Methodology | [Description] | [Description] | [Paper's approach] | | Key Strength | [Description] | [Description] | [Paper's advantage] | | Limitations | [Description] | [Description] | [Paper's limitations] | | Classification | [Color if applicable] | [Color if applicable] | [🟪/🟩/🟧/🟦] | ``` **Instructions:** - Compare the paper's approach with 2-3 existing theories/methods - Highlight the paper's 📐 contribution to literature - Include color classification in final row - Ensure row-wise and column-wise cohesion (A:B = C:D relationships) ### 📐COMPONENT 3: Need-Solution Mapping (Text Description) ```markdown **Problem (💜)**: [Clear description of the challenge/gap the paper addresses] **Solution (💚)**: [Clear description of the paper's proposed resolution] **Paper Classification**: [COLOR EMOJI] - [Brief explanation of why this classification] ``` ### 📐COMPONENT 4: Methodology Visualization (Text Description) ```markdown **Core Framework**: [Name of paper's main framework/model] **Key Process**: [Description of main methodological approach] **Tradeoffs 🔴(💜,💚)**: [What must be balanced in implementation] **Contribution Type**: [How this methodology aligns with COLOR classification] ``` ### 💸COMPONENT 5: Practical Implications Table ```markdown | Domain | Implication | Example Application | Evangelist Potential | |--------|-------------|---------------------|---------------------| | [Field 1] | [How research applies - mark with 💸] | [Concrete example] | [Who would champion this] | | [Field 2] | [How research applies - mark with 💸] | [Concrete example] | [Who would champion this] | | [Field 3] | [How research applies - mark with 💸] | [Concrete example] | [Who would champion this] | ``` **Instructions:** - Must include exactly 3 practical applications - Each must be in a different domain/field - Applications should be concrete and actionable - Mark implications with 💸 symbol - Include evangelist potential column ## EMOJI SYMBOL SYSTEM (MANDATORY USAGE) Use these symbols throughout your analysis to highlight conceptual elements: |Symbol|Meaning|When to Use| |---|---|---| |🧍‍♀️|**Agent** - Individual decisions/behaviors|When discussing people, decision-makers, individual actions| |🌏|**World** - Environmental context, systems|When discussing broader context, environments, systems| |🧭|**How** - Processes, methods, mechanisms|When discussing procedures, mechanisms, "how" something works| |🗺️|**Why** - Conceptual structures, meaning|When discussing reasons, theories, "why" something happens| |💭|**Theorizing** - Imagining new possibilities|When discussing innovation, creativity, new ideas| |📐|**Productizing** - Understanding cause-effect|When discussing systematic implementation, proven methods| |💸|**Evaluating** - Assessing value/appropriateness|When discussing practical benefits, applications, value| |🟪🟩🟧🟦|**Color Classifications**|When categorizing paper's primary contribution| ## QUALITY CONTROL CHECKLIST Before submitting your analysis, verify: - ✅ All 5 components are present and complete - ✅ Color classification is clearly stated in Component 3 - ✅ Emoji symbols are used appropriately throughout - ✅ Tables have proper markdown formatting - ✅ Analysis captures both theoretical insights and practical applications - ✅ Comparison table highlights the paper's unique contribution (💭) - ✅ Methodologies are logical and coherent with the identified problem (📐) - ✅ Applications table shows concrete examples with evangelist potential (💸) - ✅ Color classification aligns with paper's primary contribution ## EXAMPLE USAGE PATTERNS **For 🟪 Problem Papers**: Focus on problem validation, empirical evidence, phenomena description **For 🟩 Need Papers**: Emphasize framing, setup, theoretical foundations for understanding **For 🟧 Solution Papers**: Highlight proposed models, frameworks, actionable methodologies **For 🟦 Integration Papers**: Show how they bridge theory-practice or need-solution gaps ## FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS - Use proper markdown syntax for all tables - Include line breaks (`<br>`) in table cells when listing multiple items - Keep text concise but comprehensive - Always include color classification where specified - Maintain consistency between color classification and content emphasis This instruction set enables any LLM to replicate the same structured analysis and synthesis outcomes for academic papers across diverse disciplines while properly categorizing their contribution type.