👁️📍v2a_chatprep - amoon.world🌙

based on satisfaction of chat with jeff analyzed in [Preparing for VC Investor Profiles cld](https://claude.ai/chat/b8841a16-e70a-4bcb-b944-d80450aba9d9) | Step | Framework | eg1(jeff): | eg2(jb, charlie): | | ---------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Input** Files (impact score) | - Previous transcripts - Research artifacts - Theoretical frameworks | [[📝👻phantom rationalize meaning]] (9/10): Paper draft with model specs [[👻jeff__angie_phantom rationalizing meaning_otter_ai.txt]] [[👻jeff__angie_review table of contents_otter_ai (1).txt]] (7/10) [[👻jeff__angie_profile-coding_otter_ai.txt]] (8/10) concrete coding strategy along l, u, d function ![[👻_profile_coding.png\|100]] | [[📝🪶Sequential Evolutionary and Parallel Bayesian Startup Adaptations]] | | **Step 1: Review** *Belief & Desire* | Previous discussions contain key insights needing synthesis | Investor decision process has learnable structure | | | **Step 1: Review** *Strategy* | Extract core themes and open questions | Map observable→perceptual→choice pathway | | | **Step 1: Review** *Operation* | Summarize previous transcripts, highlight decision points | Created diagram of VC profile function flow | | | | | [diagram artifact](https://claude.site/artifacts/438348c1-d428-4ed9-be44-960c818bbc93) | | | **Step 2: Connect** *Belief & Desire* | Research should link to established frameworks | Need theoretical grounding for meaning construction | | | **Step 2: Connect** *Strategy* | Map current work to relevant theories | Link to rational meaning framework | | | **Step 2: Connect** *Operation* | Prepare visual representations of connections | Prepared Josh Tenenbaum's learning/utility model comparison | | | | | | | | **Step 3: Project** *Belief & Desire* | Clear next steps emerge from current position | Data collection approach needs validation | | | **Step 3: Project** *Strategy* | Identify critical path forward | Design systematic collection process | | | **Step 3: Project** *Operation* | Draft concrete action items with rationale | Draft code structure for GPT interactions | | | | | | | | **Output Vision** | - Project onto desired outcomes - Surface implicit assumptions - Identify theoretical contributions | - Model VCs as heterogeneous rational agents - Separate learning from utility - Generate insights about investor types | | | **Output Actions** | - Specific deliverables - Critical discussion points - Key decisions needed | 1. Finalize 10 VCs list 2. Define startup characteristics 3. Implement GPT interaction code | | | Input File | Content Description | Impact Score (1-10) | Key Value Added | | ------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | 1. 📝👻phantom_rationalize_meaning.md | Current paper draft with abstract, theoretical foundation, model, future direction | 9/10 | Provided structure for connecting theory to implementation | | 2. 👻jeff__angie_review_table_of_contents_otter_ai.txt | Previous meeting transcript discussing model framework | 7/10 | Revealed key decision points and theoretical links | | 3. 👻jeff__angie_profile-coding_otter_ai.txt | Latest meeting transcript on implementation details | 8/10 | | | 4. Two_Sigma_Phd_Fellowship.md | Example of vision-strategy-operations framework | 6/10 | Provided template for structuring meeting preparation | Most impactful was the paper draft (📝👻phantom_rationalize_meaning.md) as it anchored the technical discussion around concrete model specifications while maintaining connection to broader theoretical frameworks. --- ### Input Required - Previous meeting transcripts - Current research artifacts - Related theoretical frameworks ### Process Steps | Step | Belief & Desire | Strategy | Operation | | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- | | 1. Review | Previous discussions contain key insights needing synthesis | Extract core themes and open questions | Summarize previous transcripts, highlight decision points | | 2. Connect | Research should link to established frameworks | Map current work to relevant theories | Prepare visual representations of connections | | 3. Project | Clear next steps emerge from current position | Identify critical path forward | Draft concrete action items with rationale | ### Output Format 👁️VISION: - Project current research state onto desired outcomes - Surface implicit assumptions - Identify potential theoretical contributions 📍ACTION ITEMS (3 max): 1. [Specific next step with clear deliverable] 2. [Critical discussion point needing resolution] 3. [Key decision requiring input] Notes: - Vision should explicitly connect belief and desire - Actions should map strategy to concrete operations - Keep flexible for discussion evolution while maintaining focus