- going to (18-24months to be done) product design too early - iterate too long - should have buttoned up early first instance is eliminating flexibility explore the space (migrate into design solution) number of iteration increasing in the end back-loading can prolong the divergent/convergent design process process discipline effect of different tools (influence of digital design and it on modular product architecture) modular architecture were infludenced by it ![[Pasted image 20230911120306.png|100]] ptc project success (27k parts) doesn't correlate with ?? information and project A (basecampe), project B (tool churn) move onto sth else, us base design + in-design analysis (change in engineering appraoch) product, process, tool, (centracity) before (process steps, w.r.t. tech influenced best practice) -> after tools = automated but abstracted process specialized to some usecase? digital tools may lead to inefficiency () without a discipline wrong concepts to use the tool; - cloud-based tool vs process (facilitate - much faster), - scaling tools () omniscience (synthesize in process) - onshape figma (adobe) - wireframe for ux/ui design / multi user cad (implicit assumption) programming (2-3 team; new knowledge, don't know what limits are; multi-user (interface)) - version control (allowed sharing synchronously) explore as much as we can (more people knowledge upfront) - alter the divergent and convergent thinking w precursor to scaling (reject hypothesis);