2025-05-19 I asked > symbolize each linguistic instruction as:1. enhanced STRAP paper revision prompt: 📝 2. Paper Structure Table: 🗄️ 3. STRAP Framework Research Poster: Key Elements and Insights: 🖼️. as an LLM, help me understand whether it would be easier to revise between the four options: 1. receive only 📝 2. receive both 📝 and 🗄️ 3. receive both 📝 and 🖼️ 4. receive both 📝 and 🗄️ and 🖼️ [[📝Enhanced STRAP Paper Revision Prompt]] [[🗄️paper-structure-table]] # Comparing Revision Instruction Options for LLMs As an LLM tasked with understanding the relative effectiveness of different instruction combinations for revising an academic paper on the STRAP framework, here's my analysis: ## Option 1: Receive only 📝 (Enhanced STRAP Paper Revision Prompt) - **Pros**: - Provides a comprehensive, focused set of instructions in a single document - Clearly outlines the transformation goals and specific changes needed - Includes priority sections to focus on first - Contains all necessary technical details (states, formulas, transition matrices) - **Cons**: - Lacks visual reference for the final structure - No clear overview of section priorities at a glance - Might be harder to track progress against specific sections ## Option 2: Receive both 📝 and 🗄️ (Revision Prompt + Paper Structure Table) - **Pros**: - Combines detailed instructions with a clear structural overview - Table provides "at a glance" understanding of section priorities - Helps track progress section by section - Easier to maintain consistent section ordering and priority - **Cons**: - Still lacks visual reference for key visualizations - Two separate documents to integrate mentally ## Option 3: Receive both 📝 and 🖼️ (Revision Prompt + Poster Key Elements) - **Pros**: - Combines detailed instructions with visual outcome expectations - Provides clear vision of how the transition matrices should look - Helps understand the final conceptual presentation - Good for ensuring visual elements align with text - **Cons**: - Lacks the structured section-by-section overview - Potential disconnect between detailed structure and visual elements ## Option 4: Receive all three 📝, 🗄️, and 🖼️ - **Pros**: - Most comprehensive guidance package - Provides instructions, structure, and visual reference - Multiple reinforcing perspectives on the same content - Maximizes likelihood of successful revision - **Cons**: - Most information to process - Potential for information overload - Some redundancy across documents ## Recommendation For an LLM working on this revision task, **Option 2: 📝 + 🗄️** would likely be the most efficient approach for the following reasons: 1. The Enhanced STRAP Paper Revision Prompt (📝) already contains detailed descriptions of the required visualizations and transition matrices, making the separate poster explanation (🖼️) somewhat redundant 2. The Paper Structure Table (🗄️) provides crucial organizational insight that complements the detailed revision prompt, helping to: - Track progress through sections - Maintain consistent prioritization - Provide a quick reference for section organization - Ensure all components receive appropriate attention 3. For an LLM, having a clear tabular structure alongside detailed instructions creates an ideal balance of guidance without overwhelming with redundant information The combination of comprehensive instructions (📝) and structured organization guide (🗄️) would optimize the revision process by providing both detailed content requirements and a clear structural framework, enabling systematic progress tracking throughout the revision task.