[[2025-08-04|25-08-04]] | Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Bonus | Total | Key Feedback | | :--- | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | :-- | :---- | :---- | :----------- | | all | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 55 | Q1: Lost 5pts - assumes sales=demand, missing censoring analysis. Q2: Lost 5pts - weak risk pooling explanation. Q4: Lost 5pts - vague benefit quantification | | bea | 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 70 | Q1: Lost 5pts - treats sales=demand. Excellent Q2-Q4. Bonus +5 for censoring discussion in Q1 | | bum | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 80 | Perfect technical execution. Bonus +5 censoring (Method B), +5 distribution analysis (Method A vs B comparison) | | chi | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 45 | Q1-Q4: Lost 5pts each for missing explanations. Q5: Generic discussion. Needs deeper analysis throughout | | dol | 10 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 65 | Q1: Lost 5pts - sales=demand assumption. Q4: Lost 5pts - needs specific benefits. Bonus +5 for Method 3 censoring attempt | | dra | 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 65 | Q1: Lost 5pts - no censoring discussion. Excellent pooling analysis and practical mid-week strategies | | ele | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 50 | Q1: Lost 5pts - treats sales=demand. Q2&Q3: Lost 5pts each - calculations correct but minimal explanation | | fro | 10 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 60 | Strong Q4 mid-week analysis. Lost points for limited pooling explanations. Bonus +5 for data analysis discussion | | kan | 10 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 60 | Q1: Lost 5pts - sales=demand. Q4: Lost 5pts - needs quantified benefits. Strong pooling calculations | | mon | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 80 | Exceptional work. Bonus +5 censoring (Method B calculations), +5 distribution (empirical CDF analysis) | | | | | | | | | | |