# Operations Management Running Summary
**Course**: 15.778 Introduction to Operations Management
**Instructor**: Prof. Vivek Farias
**Term**: Summer 2025
---
## π― Core Framework: The Two Bubbles
### Product (Customer Perspective)
- **What problem do you solve?** (Added Value)
- **Why come to you?** (Strategic Value Positioning)
### Capabilities (Enterprise Resources)
- Financial resources
- Management structure
- Technology (R&D, IT)
- HR resources
- Sales & Marketing channels
- Supply chain
- Distribution
### Value Dimensions (TQFP)
- **Time**: Speed of service/delivery
- **Quality**: Consistency, freshness, standardization
- **Flexibility**: Customization options
- **Price**: Affordability and value proposition
---
## π Session Progress Tracker
| Session | Topic | Core Concept | Product-Capability Link | Key Insight | Questions |
|---------|-------|--------------|------------------------|-------------|-----------|
| β
1 | π Fast Food | Process Trade-offs | MTS vs MTO affects time-flexibility balance | 7 seconds = 3% market share | Why low utilization (40-79%) but slow service? |
| β³ 2 | βοΈ Airline Deicing | Capacity & Variability | | | |
| β³ 3 | π Uber | Dynamic Capacity | | | |
| β³ 4 | π₯ Healthcare | Process & Queuing | | | |
| β³ 5 | π Inventory Theory | Control Fundamentals | | | |
| β³ 6 | π Zara | Responsiveness | | | |
| β³ 7 | π Multi-location | Inventory Pooling | | | |
| β³ 8 | π° Yedioth | Newsvendor Model | | | |
| β³ 9-10 | π¦ Amazon | Network Design | | | |
| β³ 11 | π± Nokia | Supply Risk | | | |
| β³ 12 | βοΈ Airlines | Revenue Management | | | |
| β³ 13 | π Littlefield | Simulation | | | |
| β³ 14 | βοΈ GenAI | Operations Applications | | | |
| β³ 15 | π Integration | Course Synthesis | | | |
| β³ 16 | π Final | Exam Prep | | | |
---
## π Session Notes
### Session 1: Fast Food Operations (McDonald's vs. Burger King)
**Date**: July 21, 2025
**Case**: McDonald's Corp. & Burger King Corp.
#### π― Product Definition
- **Problem Solved**: Quick, affordable meals for time-constrained customers
- **Value Proposition**:
- McDonald's: Speed + consistency + low price
- Burger King: Customization ("Have it your way") + quality
- **Customer Alternative**: Other fast food chains, sit-down restaurants, home cooking
#### πͺ Capabilities Analysis
- **Key Resources**:
- McDonald's: Standardized equipment, line flow process, pre-made inventory
- Burger King: Flexible assembly stations, steam tables, customization capability
- **Constraints**:
- McDonald's: No customization possible without disrupting flow
- Burger King: Slower service time (4 min vs 2 min)
- **Competitive Advantage**:
- McDonald's: Speed and efficiency at scale
- Burger King: Product flexibility
#### π Product-Capability Dynamic
- **Current State**: Trade-off between speed and flexibility
- **1-Year Vision**: Optimize within chosen model
- **4-Year Vision**: Technology might enable mass customization
- **Resource Investment Needed**: Process redesign vs. technology adoption
#### π Value Dimensions Performance
- **Time**:
- McDonald's: βββββ (1.5-2 minutes)
- Burger King: βββββ (4 minutes)
- **Quality**: Both βββββ (standardized fast food quality)
- **Flexibility**:
- McDonald's: βββββ (no customization)
- Burger King: βββββ (limited customization)
- **Price**: Both βββββ (competitive pricing)
#### π Key Insights
1. **Time matters more than expected**: 7 seconds improvement = 3% market share gain
2. **Process design drives product capability**: MTS enables speed but kills flexibility
3. **The utilization puzzle**: Both chains show low utilization (40-79%) yet BK has slow service
#### β Open Questions
1. Why does low utilization coexist with slow service at Burger King?
2. How might technology change the speed-flexibility trade-off?
3. What hidden constraints exist beyond simple capacity?
#### π Key Concepts Introduced
- **Make-to-Stock (MTS)**: McDonald's approach - premade products
- **Hybrid Make-to-Order**: Burger King's partial customization
- **Process Capacity**: Bottleneck analysis (assembly station)
- **Utilization**: Demand/Capacity ratio
---
## π Recurring Themes
### Theme 1: Process Design Trade-offs
- Sessions: 1
- Key Pattern: You can't have everything - process design forces choices
### Theme 2: Capacity Management
- Sessions: 1 (introduced)
- Key Pattern: Capacity β Speed (the utilization puzzle)
---
## π Evolution of Understanding
### Week 1: Process Fundamentals
- Session 1: Process design creates strategic trade-offs. The product you can deliver is constrained by your process choices. Time competition is fierce - seconds matter in market share.
---
## π Simplified Daily Process
### During Class (30 seconds)
1. Rate TQFP (1-5 stars)
2. Note what they WANT vs HAVE
3. One environmental constraint
### After Class (2 minutes)
1. Fill one card using template
2. Capture trade-off in one sentence
### Weekly (5 minutes)
1. Compare cards for patterns
### How Capabilities Enable TQFP
- **Tech/IT** β Speed & Consistency
- **Supply Chain** β Price & Quality
- **HR** β Flexibility & Quality
- **Distribution** β Speed & Reach
- **Finance** β Enables all investments
- **Management** β Coordination efficiency