스캇: - 당신의 효과적 execution 따랐다 - hold up can be your friend not structured as a paper - legitimate (fonts, style, structuring) subsection with introduction (sub-subsetting) argument for one thing game your agent is playing (i got an idea; external constiguancy; ) business acting (ambiguity ) resource collaborators - ambiguious goal dimension of quality - promising promise attribute - (by 2017, 250 mile range; one dimensional; between 150~250) - me and customer (specific vs imprecise) - success probability - prepayment promise can be a cheap talk ; downpayment, - funder (range of the promise to dollars) - based on the promise, there should be money (cannot be realized) - diminishing marginal return; the more and the more precision he promises (he raises, but the less ) - the more precise you promise, the harder it is to deliver??? (250 harder to 200-300; symmetric and asymmetric) elon muskish story the more he promises, probability of delivery, goes down with the promise mean and variance of the promise game that goes on, 1. not use the word "stakeholder " 2. variance 3. promise precision sellability (customer; ) and (resource partner) maximize success probability weight of the car (2000 pounds) - weights 3000 pounds ; 1000 pounds (unsafe) scaler or not R&R variance (first paragraph, second paper) slope of the curve (demand, supply) - one could think of customer putting as down payments for the promise (how much capital they have) - i promise as i - five days - every thing BASIC GAME (ent use strategically use ambiguity; how amboutiy in terms of product quality?? - probability of dleivery go down fundamental tradeoff; the high quality i the more capital ; hedrde it will be to deliver; (shape) - if we know the curve but it is not ; ambiguous in their promise = low precision; (operations management) - optimal ambuiguity is not zero; TRANSITION to precision - sell the contribution of the paper () audience (OM) - null is, used to 15 pages --- 선생님의 클락스피드와 창업운영툴 공부가 너무 좋다. 하지르는 스캇교수님 접근을 운영적이지 않다고 했는데, 박사를 선생님한테 지원하더라도 끝까지 해내고 싶다. 새로운 걸 하다보니 이렇게 경영지식도 부족하고, 기술적인것도. 석사 논문이라 생각해주시고, 새로 다시 하면 안 되냐고. 펀드문제는 TA라도 해서 문학적 과학적 - 괴테가 사랑이 지능의 동력이라 했음. 찰리 스캇 교수님의 언어, 행동, 습관을 관찰하고 그 이면의 논리와 감정을 추론하는 일은 사랑의 에너지 없이는 불가한 일인데 - 종교적 - 한국인들은 종교적, 부처님 믿었다 예수님 믿었다 무속신앙도 믿었다 .. 한 가지 종교만 믿을 필요는 없는데,