- using [[🧲classify(evangelist, 📜)]] My classification framework maps a startup’s stakeholder-sequencing decisions onto a 2 × 2 matrix with: • Probability Ratio (PR) on the vertical axis   PR = e^{U_RP}/(e^{U_RP}+e^{U_C}) • Critical Ratio (CR) on the horizontal axis   CR = C_u / (C_u + C_o) The four canonical “moves” that relocate a venture across quadrants are: ⬆️ Move 1 (increase PR) … ↑U_RP or ↓U_C → lands in Customer-Focus ➡️ Move 2 (increase CR) … ↑C_u or ↓C_o → lands in Resource-Focus ⬇️ Move 3 (decrease PR) … ↓U_RP or ↑U_C → lands in Resource-Focus ⬅️ Move 4 (decrease CR) … ↓C_u or ↑C_o → lands in Customer-Focus **How vertical integration might shift the axes** | Mechanism of integration | Likely axis effect | |--------------------------|--------------------| | Tighter quality / faster response | ↑ U_C ⇒ PR ↓ (Move 3) | | Lock-in of upstream rents | ↓ U_RP ⇒ PR ↓ (Move 3) | | Flexibility lowers stock-out pain | ↓ C_u ⇒ CR ↓ (Move 4) | | Asset intensity raises idle-capacity cost | ↑ C_o ⇒ CR ↑ (Move 2) | **Task for each paper** 1. Summarise its main argument about startup vertical integration. 2. Identify which axis (PR or CR) the integration chiefly shifts and in which direction (↑ or ↓). 3. Conclude with the corresponding canonical move number (1-4) and a one-line rationale. Return your answer as a table: *Paper | Key insight | Axis shifted | Direction | Move # | Rationale*.