# ๐ŸฃD Feedback Integration Log ## ๐Ÿ“ฅ Active Feedback Queue | ID | Date | Source | Category | Feedback | Status | |:---:|:---:|:---|:---:|:---|:---:| | D01 | Dec 6 | ๐Ÿ…๊ถŒ์ค€ | Future Work | k* model empirical validation | ๐ŸŸก Open | --- ## ๐ŸŸก Limitations to Acknowledge (from N01, N02) ### Limitation: Revealed vs. Intended Optionality **From N01 (Asset Specificity)**: - |ฮ”V| captures *revealed* strategy change, not *intended* optionality - A founder may intend flexibility but be locked in by specific promises **Future Work Direction**: > "Our measure captures ex-post flexibility (|ฮ”V|). Future research should examine ex-ante optionality intentions through founder interviews or pitch deck analysis." --- ### Limitation: k* Empirical Operationalization **From N02 (Loch et al.)**: - Paper N derives optimal k* theoretically - Empirical validation requires observable proxies for k **Potential Proxies**: | Proxy | Data Source | Feasibility | |:---|:---|:---:| | # of market segments mentioned | Pitch decks | Medium | | # of use cases listed | Crunchbase descriptions | High | | Product pivot count | Archive.org snapshots | Medium | --- ## ๐Ÿ“Š Discussion Section Structure ``` ยถ32: Limitations - L1: Correlational design (mechanism defense) - L2: |ฮ”V| measures outcome, not capacity - L3: U.S. data generalizability - L4: Industry heterogeneity - L5: k* requires future empirical validation ยถ33: Future Directions - F1: Experimental validation - F2: International replication - F3: k* operationalization ``` --- *Next review: Integration into discussion chapter*