# 10-01
## G major: how to optimize promise's ambition and precision?
## Notes
2025:
- ์ธ๋ถ๊ธฐ์ธ risk, uncertainty + ๋ด๋ถ๊ธฐ์ธ uncertainty (negative capability), ๋ฏธ์ํจ์ด ์ฉ์ ์๋ ์๋ณํต๋ณด๋ก ์ด์ด์ง๋ ์ธ์. ๊ฒฐํผ ์ ํ๋ค๋ ๊ฒ๋ ๋น์ทํ๊ฒ ์ง.
- ์ฐฝ์์๋๋ ์ฐฝ์
์ค๋ฌด์+ํ์์๊ฒ ๋ฒ ์ด์ฆ์ฐฝ์
๋์ฆ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฒํ๊ธฐ์์. โ์ฑ๊ณตํ๋ฅ , ๋ด์, ๋ถํ"๊ฐ ๋ค๋ฅธ ๋ง๋ค์ ํ๋ค์ด ๊นจ์ฐ๊ณ ๊ฑฐ๋๋ ค ๋ํ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๋ ํ๋ฆ์ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์ ์ฃผ์ ์จ๋ก ์ผ๊ณ , ํ ์๋์ ํฌ์์ ์ฃผ๋ ํ์ต๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ๋ถํฉ๋ฆฌ์ ๋นํจ์จ์ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์์ผ๋ก ๊น๊ณ , ์์ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ ์ ๊ธฐ์ฐจ ์ญ์ฌ์ ์ฌ๊ฑด์ ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅด๋ ์ด์ผ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๋ ๋๊ฒ ์์ถํด ๊ธด์ฅ์ ์คํํฌ๋ฅผ ์ผ์ผํค์๋ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์ค๊ณ์์ (์์ค ํ์ผ๋น์์ ๋ฌธ์ฅ ์ฐจ์ฉ)"
it was your mantra ""turning inside out
just to be clear, i'm not giving up hope with designX (dx) as that's MIT's best shot for now.
i was simply sharing i_cost_ion << i_cost_dx due to cultural proximity. that said, i_cost_ion > i_cost_dx is possible if geometrical proximity factor matters more. ultimately selecting collaborator depends on the function (e.g. educate to share knowledge VS apply to enable use) and form (e.g. curriculum VS product) value chain
SC2 (simulate-calibrate-commit) vs SCD (simulate-calibrate-design)
SC2 has two meanings:
1. supply chains - founder should plan for two options of product, process, organization
2. stands for founder's toolchain to maximize success probability with simulate-calibrate-commit
dx:
ion: product
especially on modular vs integrated design.
#๐