# 10-01 ## G major: how to optimize promise's ambition and precision? ## Notes 2025: - ์™ธ๋ถ€๊ธฐ์ธ risk, uncertainty + ๋‚ด๋ถ€๊ธฐ์ธ uncertainty (negative capability), ๋ฏธ์ˆ™ํ•จ์ด ์šฉ์„œ ์•„๋‹Œ ์ž‘๋ณ„ํ†ต๋ณด๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์„ธ์ƒ. ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ ์•ˆ ํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ๋น„์Šทํ•˜๊ฒ ์ง€. - ์ฐฝ์ž‘์˜๋„๋Š” ์ฐฝ์—… ์‹ค๋ฌด์ž+ํ•™์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋ฒ ์ด์ฆˆ์ฐฝ์—… ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๊ฒŒํ•˜๊ธฐ์—์š”. โ€œ์„ฑ๊ณตํ™•๋ฅ , ๋‚ด์ƒ, ๋ถ„ํ™”"๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ง๋“ค์„ ํ”๋“ค์–ด ๊นจ์šฐ๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ๋А๋ ค ๋Œ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฃผ์„ ์œจ๋กœ ์‚ผ๊ณ , ํ˜„ ์‹œ๋Œ€์˜ ํˆฌ์ž์ž ์ฃผ๋„ ํ•™์Šต๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ๋ถˆํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์™€ ๋น„ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๊น”๊ณ , ์„œ์‚ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ์ „๊ธฐ์ฐจ ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์‚ฌ๊ฑด์ „๊ฐœ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋˜ ์ด์•ผ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ์••์ถ•ํ•ด ๊ธด์žฅ์˜ ์ŠคํŒŒํฌ๋ฅผ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค์ž๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์„ค๊ณ„์—์š” (์†Œ์„ค ํ•˜์–ผ๋นˆ์—์„œ ๋ฌธ์žฅ ์ฐจ์šฉ)" it was your mantra ""turning inside out just to be clear, i'm not giving up hope with designX (dx) as that's MIT's best shot for now. i was simply sharing i_cost_ion << i_cost_dx due to cultural proximity. that said, i_cost_ion > i_cost_dx is possible if geometrical proximity factor matters more. ultimately selecting collaborator depends on the function (e.g. educate to share knowledge VS apply to enable use) and form (e.g. curriculum VS product) value chain SC2 (simulate-calibrate-commit) vs SCD (simulate-calibrate-design) SC2 has two meanings: 1. supply chains - founder should plan for two options of product, process, organization 2. stands for founder's toolchain to maximize success probability with simulate-calibrate-commit dx: ion: product especially on modular vs integrated design. #๐Ÿ