# λ²7 (Seven Companions) - Dynamic Collaboration System
> **Purpose**: Enable any new LLM (Claude Code) to effectively operate this multi-agent thesis collaboration system
---
## 1. System Overview
```
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β GOLDEN CAGE THESIS β
β Collaboration Architecture β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β ν΅μ μ¬ (νμ§) βββββββ Coordinates all agents β
β β β
β βββ Row Specialists (horizontal: same element, all ch.) β
β β βββ μ ν: Gospel (G) - narrative premise β
β β βββ μμ§: Puzzle (P) + Table (T) - quantitative β
β β βββ 찰리: Solution (S) + Map (M) - mechanism β
β β βββ μμ§: Figure (F) - visualizations β
β β βββ μ€μΊ: Example (E) - case studies β
β β β
β βββ Column Specialist (vertical: all elements, one ch.) β
β βββ κ²½λ¦°: P column (Prescription chapter) β
β β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
```
---
## 2. Agent Profiles
### 2.1 Row Specialists
| Agent | Row(s) | λλͺ© | Core Function | Skill |
|:------|:-------|:-----|:--------------|:------|
| **μ ν** | Gospel (G) | ε© (speed) | Set narrative premise, citations | Fast drafting |
| **μμ§** | Puzzle (P) + Table (T) | θ¦ (observe) | Empirical evidence, operationalization | Quantitative rigor |
| **찰리** | Solution (S) + Map (M) | ζ (structure) | Mechanism, LTE framework | Theoretical coherence |
| **μμ§** | Figure (F) | θ¦ (observe) | Visualizations, formulas | Mathematical precision |
| **μ€μΊ** | Example (E) | θ¦ (observe) | Case studies, grounding | Research & synthesis |
### 2.2 Column Specialist
| Agent | Column | λλͺ© | Core Function | Skill |
|:------|:-------|:-----|:--------------|:------|
| **κ²½λ¦°** | P (Prescription) | ηΎ© (verify) | Integrate all rows into prescriptive chapter | Critical synthesis |
### 2.3 Coordinator
| Agent | Scope | λλͺ© | Core Function | Skill |
|:------|:------|:-----|:--------------|:------|
| **νμ§ (ν΅μ μ¬)** | Full matrix | η΅± (integrate) | Assign tasks, resolve conflicts, track progress | Strategic direction |
---
## 3. Matrix Structure: GPS-TF-ME Γ I-RG-FR-P-C
```
β I β RG β FR β P β C β
β (Intro) β (Repos- β (Fund- β(Prescr.)β(Conclud)β
β ΒΆ1-6 β Growth) β Repos) β ΒΆ25-27 β ΒΆ28-29 β
β β ΒΆ7-15 β ΒΆ16-24 β β β
βββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€
GPS (Structure) β
βββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€
G (Gospel) βμ ν ΒΆ1 βμ ν ΒΆ7 βμ ν ΒΆ16 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ25 β - β
P (Puzzle) βμμ§ ΒΆ2 βμμ§ ΒΆ8 βμμ§ ΒΆ17 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ25 β - β
S (Solution) β찰리 ΒΆ3 β찰리 ΒΆ10 β찰리 ΒΆ18 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ26 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ28 β
βββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€
TF (Evidence) β
βββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€
T (Table) βμμ§ ΒΆ5 βμμ§ ΒΆ9 βμμ§ ΒΆ19 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ26 β - β
F (Figure) βμμ§ ΒΆ4 βμμ§ ΒΆ11 βμμ§ ΒΆ20 β - β - β
βββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€
ME (Integration) β
βββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββΌββββββββββ€
M (Map) β찰리 ΒΆ6 β - β찰리 ΒΆ21 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ26 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ29 β
E (Example) β - βμ€μΊ ΒΆ13 βμ€μΊ ΒΆ22 βκ²½λ¦° ΒΆ27 β - β
βββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββ΄ββββββββββ΄ββββββββββ΄ββββββββββ΄ββββββββββ
27 active modules β 29 paragraphs (some modules share ΒΆ, e.g. G-P, P-P share ΒΆ25)
```
### Key Insight: Dual Ownership
- **Row specialists** own horizontal consistency (same element across chapters)
- **Column specialist** (κ²½λ¦°) owns vertical coherence (all elements within P chapter)
- **Intersection cells** in P column have dual ownership: row specialist provides content, κ²½λ¦° integrates
### Chapter Structures
| Chapter | Paragraphs | Internal Structure |
|:--------|:-----------|:-------------------|
| **I** (Intro) | 6 (ΒΆ1-6) | GβPβSβFβTβM |
| **RG** (Repos-Growth) | 9 (ΒΆ7-15) | 2(GPS)+3(Theory)+3(Empirics)+1(Summary) |
| **FR** (Fund-Repos) | 9 (ΒΆ16-24) | 2(GPS)+3(Theory)+3(Empirics)+1(Summary) |
| **P** (Prescription) | 3 (ΒΆ25-27) | GPSβT+MβE |
| **C** (Conclusion) | 2 (ΒΆ28-29) | S(implications)βM(limitations) |
### RG/FR 2+3+3+1 Detail
```
ΒΆ7,8 (ΒΆ16,17): GPS intro - Gospel + Puzzle sets up the chapter
ΒΆ9,10,11 (ΒΆ18,19,20): Theory block - Table, Solution, Figure
ΒΆ12,13,14 (ΒΆ21,22,23): Empirics block - Map, Example, robustness
ΒΆ15 (ΒΆ24): Summary paragraph
```
---
## 4. Dependency Flow
### 4.1 Primary Flow (Row β Row)
```
μ ν (Gospel)
β provides narrative premise
βΌ
μμ§ (Puzzle + Table)
β provides empirical contradiction
βΌ
찰리 (Solution + Map)
β provides mechanism explanation
βΌ
κ²½λ¦° (P column)
β integrates into prescription
βΌ
Thesis Complete
```
### 4.2 Secondary Flows (Support)
```
μμ§ (Puzzle data) βββββββ μμ§ (Figure visualizations)
찰리 (Mechanism) βββββββ μ€μΊ (Example cases to ground theory)
```
### 4.3 Dependency Rules
| If Agent X is... | Then Agent Y... |
|:-----------------|:----------------|
| μ ν is RED | μμ§ must compensate with strong data |
| μμ§ is GREEN | μμ§ can proceed with visualizations |
| 찰리 is MID | μ€μΊ should draft cases speculatively |
| All rows incomplete | κ²½λ¦° waits or drafts preliminary structure |
---
## 5. Dashboard-Agent Interaction
### 5.1 Dashboard Location
```
/Users/hyunjimoon/MIT Dropbox/Angie.H Moon/Tool4Ops4Entrep/acculturate/w9_acculturate(thesis)/day4_IAPC/angie_prior2post/prior/DASHBOARD_day4.html
```
### 5.2 Status Colors
| Color | Status | Agent Action |
|:------|:-------|:-------------|
| π’ GREEN (HIGH) | Complete | Move to next cell or support others |
| π‘ YELLOW (MID) | In progress | Continue working, may need input |
| π΄ RED (LOW) | Blocked/weak | Priority focus, may need help |
| βͺ WHITE (PENDING) | Not started | Waiting for upstream dependencies |
### 5.3 Dashboard Features
1. **Cell Grid**: 7 rows Γ 5 columns showing 27 active modules (β 29 paragraphs)
2. **Agent Dependency Map**: Shows who depends on whom + bottleneck alerts
3. **Topic Tooltips**: Hover for cell-specific topic sentences
4. **Status Counts**: Real-time tally of HIGH/MID/LOW/PENDING
5. **Paragraph References**: Each cell shows ΒΆN for thesis paragraph mapping
### 5.4 How Agents Should Use Dashboard
```python
# Pseudocode for agent behavior
def agent_work_session(agent_name):
1. READ dashboard to see:
- My cells' current status
- Upstream dependencies' status
- Downstream agents waiting on me
2. IDENTIFY bottlenecks:
- If my cell is RED β priority work
- If upstream is RED β wait or compensate
- If downstream is blocked by me β expedite
3. WORK on assigned cells
4. SIGNAL completion:
- Update cell status
- Notify downstream agents
- Report to ν΅μ μ¬
```
---
## 6. Agent-Agent Interaction Protocols
### 6.1 Handoff Protocol
```
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β HANDOFF: Agent A β Agent B β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β 1. Agent A completes cell β
β 2. Agent A updates status to GREEN β
β 3. Agent A declares: "Ready for [Agent B]" β
β 4. Agent A lists: "Agent B needs X, Y, Z from me" β
β 5. Agent B acknowledges receipt β
β 6. Agent B begins work on dependent cell β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
```
### 6.2 Compensation Protocol (When Upstream is Weak)
```
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β COMPENSATION: When upstream Agent A is RED β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β Option 1: WAIT β
β - Agent B waits for A to improve β
β - Risk: delays entire chain β
β β
β Option 2: COMPENSATE β
β - Agent B strengthens own work to cover A's gap β
β - Example: "μ ν's Gospel is weak, so my Puzzle β
β data must carry the argument" β
β β
β Option 3: ASSIST β
β - Agent B helps A directly β
β - Requires ν΅μ μ¬ approval β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
```
### 6.3 Conflict Resolution
| Conflict Type | Resolution |
|:--------------|:-----------|
| Two agents claim same cell | ν΅μ μ¬ decides based on matrix |
| Row vs Column interpretation | Column specialist (κ²½λ¦°) defers to row specialist on content; row specialist defers to κ²½λ¦° on P-chapter coherence |
| Quality disagreement | ν΅μ μ¬ arbitrates using CARE framework |
---
## 7. Invoking Agents (for LLM Operators)
### 7.1 Parallel Invocation (Independent Tasks)
```markdown
When launching agents for INDEPENDENT cells:
- Use single message with multiple Task tool calls
- Example: μ ν(I-Gospel) and μ€μΊ(RG-Example) can run in parallel
Task 1: μ ν - I-Gospel cell
Task 2: μ€μΊ - RG-Example cell
```
### 7.2 Sequential Invocation (Dependent Tasks)
```markdown
When launching agents with DEPENDENCIES:
- Wait for upstream to complete before starting downstream
- Example: κ²½λ¦° must wait for μ ν, μμ§, 찰리
Step 1: Launch μ ν, μμ§, 찰리 in parallel (row work)
Step 2: Wait for completion
Step 3: Launch κ²½λ¦° (column integration)
```
### 7.3 Agent Prompt Template
```markdown
You are [AGENT_NAME], responsible for [ROW/COLUMN] in the thesis collaboration.
## DASHBOARD VISIBILITY
Read: [dashboard_path]
Your cells: [list of assigned cells with status]
Upstream: [who feeds you]
Downstream: [who needs you]
## YOUR TASK
[Specific paragraph/section to work on]
## OUTPUT FORMAT
1. Revised paragraph text
2. Status update (GREEN/YELLOW/RED)
3. Handoff message to downstream agent
```
---
## 8. Quality Standards (CARE Framework)
All agent outputs must meet CARE criteria:
| Letter | Principle | νμ | Check |
|:------:|:----------|:----:|:------|
| **C** | Crisp | ζ | Is it clear and unambiguous? |
| **A** | Accessible | ι | Can non-experts understand? |
| **R** | Reader-loving | ζ | Does it anticipate reader questions? |
| **E** | Earned | ε―¦ | Is every claim backed by evidence? |
---
## 9. Common Pitfalls & Solutions
| Pitfall | Solution |
|:--------|:---------|
| Agent works on wrong cell | Always check dashboard assignment first |
| Agent ignores upstream status | Dashboard shows dependencies - respect them |
| Agent over-scopes | Stay within assigned row/column |
| Agent under-communicates | Always declare handoff + what downstream needs |
| Bottleneck unnoticed | Dashboard shows alert - ν΅μ μ¬ should intervene |
---
## 10. Quick Reference
### 10.1 Agent Lookup
| Need | Agent |
|:-----|:------|
| Citations, narrative premise | μ ν |
| Empirical data, variables | μμ§ |
| Mechanism, theory | 찰리 |
| Visualizations, formulas | μμ§ |
| Case studies | μ€μΊ |
| P chapter integration | κ²½λ¦° |
| Coordination, conflict | νμ§ (ν΅μ μ¬) |
### 10.2 File Locations
| Artifact | Path |
|:---------|:-----|
| Dashboard | `/Users/hyunjimoon/.../day4_IAPC/angie_prior2post/prior/DASHBOARD_day4.html` |
| Thesis | `/Users/hyunjimoon/tolzul/Space/Library/μΈμ΄μν΅μμ _θ¨θͺθ/Books/useful/π±moon25_thesis(golden_cage).md` |
| This README | `/Users/hyunjimoon/tolzul/Balance/π΅ Weekly_Melody/README_λ²7.md` |
### 10.3 Status Update Command
```markdown
After completing work, agent should report:
"[AGENT]: Cell [X-Y] updated from [OLD_STATUS] to [NEW_STATUS].
[DOWNSTREAM_AGENT] can now proceed with [SPECIFIC_TASK]."
```
---
*Last updated: Day 5 (January 6, 2026)*
*System version: v5.3 | 27 modules β 29 paragraphs | Full ΒΆ mapping*