창업정신은 "~"로 정의되기도 하는데, 낙관[1]을 전파한 책임이 가장 무거워. 앞서 이야기 나눴든, 나 스스로도 속이고 (fake it [1]낙관과 낭만의 차이는 잘 모르겠음. 혹시 알아? ---- 빨강 소중한게 생기면 끝부터 생각하는 버릇이 잘 안 고쳐져. --- 잔인한 낙관. 낙관은 활력이자 독이다. 내가 마음을 주고 상대가 그 마음을 받아주면, 나는 그 사람을 낙관의 독으로부터 보호할 책임져야하는데, 1. given our interaction, infer my communication strategy to collaborators (charlie and scott). your answer should include evaluation metric, bottleneck breaking, consistency 2. given 1, and situation inferred from charlie's question, help me draft # angie answer # angie's request Dear Charlie and Scott, Happy New Year! Here's today's [thesis module](https://0599faed.streak-link.com/Ct3NcG-Ly-f_QMRfkA7nJO5U/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fscl%2Ffo%2F9aw1um4ow4k0ssc9ja28w%2FALXffPDfs0hoGFM303HUPDM%3Frlkey%3Dhamshce3gvbo4c64ris20j1vh%26dl%3D0) for your review. You can see system [evolution here](https://0599faed.streak-link.com/Ct3NcHDrK-tcXzSWWg2eDDwf/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dropbox.com%2Fscl%2Ffo%2Fz7n4ntq32mzgkkdj0pakl%2FAB-YSv0eDNDuXoyNK9MFB3o%3Frlkey%3D3wtpgc1d6281ulpqaxn2ojumx%26dl%3D0). **Note**: This is a rough draft as I've been chasing Motional as a moving target. Upcoming version will be sharper with clearer focus. **Reading order**  1. `4_DASHBOARD.html` — visual summary (click cards to expand) 2. `2_Q_ADVISORS.docx` — 5 questions in A/B format 3. `1_THESIS.docx` — I'm understanding my AI(claude agents)'s behavior and I feel this draft is on I, BT, BM, C module from the dashboard **Questions** - Q1: Syntax Master (which paper templates "contingent qualification"?) - Q2: Trap Scope (one trap or two?) - Q3: Van den Steen (scope extension or object redefinition?) - Q4: Terminology (repositioning "capability" or "capacity"?) - Q5: Template Paper (which paper to use as writing template?) While you review, I'll be building writing assistants for each template paper (Cronin LTE, Gans-Stern theory, Fine 10 Tools) so I can quickly apply your feedback to match target publication styles. Happy to meet to walk through! Angie # charlie's question Hi Angie. I don’t understand these questions.  Please elaborate.  Thanks.  Charlie - ### Charlie's Questions → Operations/Framework - | Question | If You Choose A | If You Choose B | - |:---------|:----------------|:----------------| - | Q1: Sell × Deliver | Synchronized scaling | Joint optimization | - | Q2: 10 Tools | Evaluate-first principle | Breadth-contingent sequencing | - | Q3: **Capacity vs Capability** | Teecean dynamic capabilities | Resource-based slack | - | Q4: Paper Structure | Keep IABC format | Convert to academic template | - | Q5: Syntax Master | Van den Steen (2017) | Your recommendation | # angie's answer\ Oh I'm sorry Charlie. And thanks for asking. My communication strategy has been two: 1. bottleneck breaking, given the evaluation metric .5(applicability to motional) + .5(look-think-acts like a thesis) 2. requesting information