[[09-19|25-09-19]] 김정하 교수님께. 저는 강인하고 순한 언어를 쓰는 경계인 문현지입니다. 문학과 정신분석을 못 배운 한이 창업의 열정과 만나, 저를 미치게 하고 있습니다. 구조 요청드립니다. 교수님께서 2024년 강의자료 "사랑, 정동, 낙관"과 "나르시시즘"을 공유해주시면, 아래와 같은 자력 구제를 약속드립니다. 박사논문 자격시험 (9월 15일)에 주장할 생각을 그림으로 표현했습니다. 강의자료로 그리는 교수님 지혜의 온기로, 10일 동안 다음을 구체화할 에너지를 얻고자 합니다. 1. 창업자들에게 관찰되는 야망, 구체, 설득 저주의 정신분석적 이해 2. Cruel optimism (p.43): "약속의 약속"의 계층적 분화가 만드는 교환가능성 3. 기술에 대한 잔인한 낙관으로부터 창업가를 보호할 방법 문현지 올림 ---- [[Bateson2000_ecology_of_mind]] - A separation is thus generated between the two sorts of problem. It is possible that this separation of problems was an error, but —error or not—the separation is maintained in the fundamentals of modern science. The conservative laws for matter and energy are still separate from the laws of order, negative entropy, and information. - The permutations and combinations of variables classifiable which define this the states of an organism are and—to extent—noninterchangeable. The system is therefore multiplicative. Its mathematics will resemble that of information theory or negative that of money or energy conservation. - ➕ A system will be additive insofar as the units of its currency are mutually independent. Here there would seem to be a difference between the economic system of the individual, tractive) whose budgetary problems are and those of society at large, additive where the (or suboverall distribution or flow of wealth is governed by complex (and perhaps imperfect) homeostatic systems. Is there, perhaps, an economics of economic flexibility which is multiplicative and so resembles physiological flexibility discussed above? that the units of this wider economics but patterns of distribution of wealth.